It is a common knowledge that it is always better to have a house staged than let it sit empty, and I tend to agree with that not just because I am a practicing stager, but also because it makes a great sense to stage a house: staging investment pays off many times over. Good stagers do a great work, showing a house best potential and addressing it’s functionality. Here are some points to determine if your stager gave a house a good attention:
- Furniture and art placed in the house suit its architecture and period.
- All items are attractive and communicate to each other in balance, scale and color
- Staging exhibits a good taste of the stager
- Functionality of spaces are addressed correctly
- All accessories and staging pieces strategically placed and make sense
- House “flows” all spaces are well connected and “communicate to each other
Talking about “bare minimum.” There is no warm feeling about this house, no pretty things, and furniture is not in scale. Activities? Yes, they were addressed: Did you notice a big basket full of pine cones next to the sofa on left? I guess visitors won’t get bored in this room for awhile…
Red Carpet, Anyone?
I ‘ve never tired to preach: Everything going to the stage has a purpose, and implies certain activity. If this stager followed this rule by putting place mats on the kitchen counter, he/she suggesting eating at the counter standing in the kitchen?
SHARE IF YOU DARE...
By not providing any sitting area, but putting a tray on the bed, stager is suggesting that room is so small, there is no place to sit, except of the bed.
How all these objects are related to each other? This display is very confusing…
Sometimes the opposite is true: suggested activity is too suggestive…
And this is just in case you confused YOUR home with a place of your drinking buddy.
I hope my blog made you smile….
I hope my blog made you smile….